Friday, August 31, 2007

Other items of note

Paper Economy's S&P/Case Shiller tool shows Los Angeles continued down in June, dropping .4% from May. See my July post for more. Unfortunately this is looking two months in the rear-view mirror; expect more drama over the next three months!

Diana Olick's (CNBC today) "White House Has It all WRONG On Subprime" (be sure to watch the video).

Mr. Mortgage's (today) "FHA Plan: Bring a water gun to fight a fire". I wonder how much is political posturing, to appear to be doing something?

Tom Whipple's (Energy Bulletin / Falls Church News-Press 8/30/07) "The peak oil crisis: the quiet time".
... The oil market has been so fixated by the hurricane and credit crisis in recent weeks that little notice has been taken of a looming supply crunch. Last week’s market U.S. stockpile report had imports and crude stocks up a bit, but gasoline stocks dropping by a whopping 5 million barrels. ...

The likelihood of an imminent credit-crunch-induced recession seems far higher to OPEC officials at the minute than to Wall Street brokers. For OPEC, the credit crunch may be just an excuse to cover their inability to increase production....

Michael Kinsley's (Time magazine 8/23/07) "Your House Is Worth Less? Good".

... Since most families own their homes, the country is happier when real estate prices are going up. But it is healthier when prices are going down. Look at it this way: in the housing market, people fall into three categories. Some, mostly young folks, are trying to buy their first home. Some, at various stages of midlife, own a home but will trade up someday, or at least think about it. And some, mostly older, are trying to sell and downsize. Who is served by soaring house prices? Not the first group: rising prices make it hard for those people to get into the game. Not the second group: what it will have to pay for a bigger house is probably increasing faster than what it can get for the current one. ...

Mariel Garza's (LA Daily News 8/25/07) "Let mortgage fires burn on".

... I'm not sorry that real-estate prices are creeping down by the glut of desperate "for sale" signs all over Southern California. ...

Weekly Inventory Update

8/31 - Inventory is slightly down for the week, up for the month, and the listings are getting older (DOM increasing). More price reductions. Let's see how listings and sales do when the fall season begins after Labor Day.

8/24 - These stats have needed a graph; here is one, showing my Santa Monica (under $3M) and Palms-Mar Vista inventory on the right axis and OC Renter's LA County inventory on the left. LA is up over last year; SM is down.

Big jump in listings, 10%+/- for the week! SM is up 6 from 9 new listings; PP up 1; and MV up 11 from 13 new listings.

8/17 - Santa Monica and Palisades are pretty flat; Mar Vista is down despite new listings.

8/10 - Santa Monica is down 2, Palisades down 5, Mar Vista up 5.

See Calculated Risk for explanation of what the Federal Reserve did the last three days to add liquidity. Essentially the Fed loaned a lot of money to banks short term, with Mortage-Backed Securities as collateral. The Fed did not buy those securities.

8/3 - Westside inventory is up 2.6% from the end of July. I also seem to be seeing more price reductions and failed escrows (financing failed?) in Santa Monica, Palisades, and Mar Vista.

       LA County  Santa Monica  Pacific Palisades  Mar Vista
<$3M New Tot DOM<$2M New Tot DOM Tot New DOM

_________ _______________ _______________ ___________


1/30/06 27,732
2/28/06 29,420
3/31/06 31,819
4/21/06 33,054 35
5/ 1/06 34,032 38 33
6/ 2/06 37,847 56 36 38
6/30/06 42,317 66 40 49
8/ 4/06 45,315 70 34 50
9/ 1/06 46,781 71 27 59
10/ 6/06 47,369 83 25 98 71
11/ 3/06 45,780 80 20 91 77
12/ 1/06 43,103 65 18 72 96 39 20
1/ 5/07 35,646 54 4 60 117 33 6 71 66
2/ 2/07 36,715 38 15 45 124 29 16 61 71
3/ 2/07 41,251 42 14 51 114 26 10 68 79 53 25 76
4/ 6/07 42,857 41 23 49 107 18 8 73 103 52 52 50
5/ 4/07 45,918 46 28 54 92 19 6 82 79 68 37 52
6/ 1/07 52,198 50 25 61 78 17 15 87 78 77 39 53
6/30/07 52,769 42 18 56 81 17 11 92 77 74 33 61
8/ 3/07 54,166 53 28 68 86 23 12 78 76 84 39 68
8/10/07 54,802 51 8 67 90 18 3 74 87 88 13 69
8/17/07 52 11 67 97 18 5 77 78 81 21 73
8/24/07 56,118 58 20 72 94 19 7 77 69 92 34 73
8/31/07 57,432 57 21 72 98 18 7 69 75 90 39 79
9/ 7/07

All Westside (updated 1st Fri. of mo.)

                   2/9  3/1  4/6  5/4  6/1 6/30 8/03 8/31
Bel Air-Holmby Hls. 86 86 92 100 103 99 86 99
Beverly Center-M.M. 64 57 48 53 54 65 64 67
Beverly Hills 67 70 56 46 53 49 59 61
B.H. Post Office 94 91 92 88 93 95 92 94
Beverlywood Vic. 35 36 31 39 38 41 42 46
Brentwood 67 71 73 75 72 68 86 77
Cheviot H.-R.Pk.'8' 22 20 19 22 23 22 26 20
Culver City 35 25 20 28 33 36 41 48
Malibu 178 181 192 199 206 220 224 216
Malibu Beach 42 44 51 52 56 58 54 45
Marina Del Rey 20 20 20 27 29 28 26 27
Pacific Palisades 64 68 73 82 87 92 78 69
Palms-Mar Vista 62 53 52 68 77 73 84 90
Playa Del Rey 7 8 17 20 21 20 21 24
Playa Vista 3 2 3 1 3 5 4 9
Santa Monica 50 50 49 53 61 57 68 72
Sunset Stp.-Hwd.H. 155 178 159 166 180 168 187 184
Topanga 39 41 36 43 45 54 49 54
Venice 64 64 57 68 70 72 69 68
West Hollywood Vic. 23 32 25 36 42 41 40 36
West L.A. 19 21 25 24 25 34 31 36
Westchester 53 46 47 45 53 52 62 72
Westwood-Cent.City 33 44 37 42 33 34 29 37
____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
Total 1282 1308 1274 1377 1457 1483 1522 1551
Month-month incr. 2% -3% 8% 6% 2% 3% 2%

Notes

LA County inventory via OC Renter. Santa Monica Days on Market (DOM) is for <$3M, and omits Santa Monica Canyon (in City of Los Angeles but S.M. Post Office). Pacific Palisades DOM is for <$2M and count omits mobile homes. "New" is for previous month, or month-to-date for current partial month.

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Cheap north of Montana

This new 2 bed / 2 bath listing at 420 7th St. for $1.4M is interesting for being north of Montana for well under $2M. Not a tiny lot, presumed a tear-down, but on very-busy 7th St., the main road into Santa Monica Canyon. I've outlined its lot above. A recent comp is 633 7th, 3 bed / 2 bath, sold 12/6/06 for $1.41M. You could drop by the brokers open today (wonder who the "committee" is?):

"Original 1950's charmer close to Montana Avenue & the beach. Single-story with 2BD, 2BA, living room, dining & 2 garages (one attached & one detached). Bring your architect to add-on or build your dream home. Tons of opportunity! Offers subject to review of committee. Open for the first time Tuesday Aug 28, 11-2 PM"

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

USA Today lead

USA Today's lead article was striking (no link because I can't find it on their website; emphasis added):

The news Monday from the National Association of Realtors was bad enough: Sales of existing homes fell in July to their slowest pace in five years. The glut of homes for sale is at a 16-year high. The median price is down for a record 12th month in a row.

What's really grim, though, is this: None of the figures reflect this month's turmoil in the mortgage market. Which is why the numbers will likely be even worse in coming months. And why the NAR doesn't expect the housing market to recover until early next year. ...

Can you believe that!?! We're falling off a cliff ... until everything is wonderful again in maybe six months. Add another to NAR spin vs. reality history.

Nothing sold

Nothing sold over the weekend in Santa Monica. I always expect something to go into escrow between Friday evening and Monday evening. Nothing did in Santa Monica.

Remember 2614 2nd (above), 3 bed / 1.75 bath, at the corner of Ocean Park Blvd? It's been on the market about a year. Originally listed at $1,495K, its price has been $1,375K since March and now was finally cut to $1,250K. How many other prices of long-languishing properties will start breaking soon?

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Bailouts?

Mr.Mortgage asked, "In the spirirt of democracy and a good Saturday round table discussion, what is your view on the proposed bailout plans that the presidential candidates have been discussing?"

This is important and timely, with recent posts by Mish, OC Renter, Calculated Risk, Housing Doom, and Marinite. The LA Times editorialized against it, linked on the LA Land blog. I also posted back in March on Marinite's wiki and an LA Times article on earlier bailout proposals.

My main points include: (1) How can buyers who just can't afford their mortgages be successfully bailed out? (2) How would that not also bail out undeserving speculators and irresponsible lenders? (3) Bailouts would delay the necessary fall in house prices before the market can recover at affordable price levels.

I see two levels operating: First, politicians want to appear to be doing something. The probably good news is that whatever modest amount of money committed would be little more than symbolic, with no big effect, good or bad.

But the bigger question is, I can imagine the Fed and major banks searching in uncharted territory for something to avoid major defaults. We've seen initial actions with lowering the discount rate and getting big banks to borrow there. Presuming that doesn't solve the problem, what happens next?

Thursday, August 23, 2007

"Reasons Housing Will Retrace to 1997"

Great timing: on the heels of Tuesday's "Return to historic costs/income", Charles Hugh Smith wrote yesterday on "Two Irresistible Reasons Housing Will Retrace to 1997 Prices". His graph above shows what that decline looked like in Japan. He begins:

Two historically irresistible patterns suggest speculative-bubble housing values will eventually retrace back to their 1995-1997 levels:
  • the symmetry of speculative rises and retraces
  • the unbreakable links between income and housing values.

I encourage you to read his whole essay (and follow his blog, which was an inspiration to starting mine).